![lipstickalley michael jackson bad album critics lipstickalley michael jackson bad album critics](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZBB86m3cM7o/maxresdefault.jpg)
Black success is always questioned by Datalounge and black people are always deemed unworthy. The only thing that Datalounge hates more than black people is successful black people. Most people struggle with public speaking. Most Americans don’t have post secondary educations. Pop music doesn’t need to be brilliant and most entertainers don’t have post secondary educations. Your parents hated the shit that you loved. Beyoncé does not make music for 65 yr olds.
Dataloungers have the habit of proclaiming that anyone who they don’t like is not talented. It doesn’t cost me anything to admit that artist who don’t appeal to me are talented and deserve their success. She has millions of fans and she has sold millions of records. Because of that she achieved tremendous success. She’s a pop artist who makes music that people enjoy. However, she is a talented singer and dancer. I knew she was around to stay when Mariah Carey so blatantly copped her look for the cover of Emancipation Of Mimi. Her songs largely sound alike, you know what she's going to say before she opens her mouth, she knows that the poor-rich-me-I'm-just-like-you schtick sells to people who are nothing like her at all, but she always has great choreography. What I don't like is that wavering from the idea that Beyonce Is God automatically gets you branded as racist by too many people, which is ridiculous & weak because in reality Beyonce is one note. Expressing hyper support for this woman suggests to those concerned that you're on top of all these trends without question & on the terms proposed, even if you have no idea what you're actually standing up for. She's definitely benefitted from & exploited particular social movements that have overtaken social media & branding over these past few years. Supporting Beyonce to the frenzied pitch that so many people do is a bit understandable, as saying you do allows you to check so many boxes on the Concerned Intersectional Citizen application. It's up to you to decide whether Taylor Swift is a better musical artist than Kate Bush, Tori Amos and Fiona Apple, but I'd say she's earned the awards with popularity and sales more than musicianship or profound songwriting. Taylor Swift sells more than anyone and she has been nominated for 41 Grammys and has won 11.
![lipstickalley michael jackson bad album critics lipstickalley michael jackson bad album critics](https://static.billboard.com/files/media/michael-jackson-off-the-wall-1979-cover-crop-billboard-650-compressed.jpg)
She has been nominated for 11 Grammys and has won three. Meanwhile, Britney Spears, who is a product of the music industry who has sold well but who doesn't write or play music and whose voice is largely engineered, has also been nominated for 8 Grammys and has won one.įiona Apple is a very rare exception as an artist whose every album is declared a work of genius by music critics but don't move huge numbers of records. Tori Amos, the youngest person ever admitted to the Peabody Conservatory of Music at age 5 for being a piano virtuoso, has been nominated for 8 Grammys and has won zero. Kate Bush, roundly appreciated as one of the most influential musicians of her generation, has been nominated for three Grammys-including none for her most celebrated album, Hounds of Love-and has won zero Grammys. Male artists fare better than female artists do with these awards, but a few stats show that transactions > fine arts with the Recording Academy:
![lipstickalley michael jackson bad album critics lipstickalley michael jackson bad album critics](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--sdyWezIC--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_320/yomjtxoslwsogywwmolb.jpg)
With some notable exceptions, Grammys generally award commercial successes and not musical prowess or artistry. And yet this woman has a staggering 24 Grammys and 800 awards in total.